摘要的自我吹嘘crowning achievement没有了。
在论文的正文第4页第一段，就是公开道歉，给Kleiner 和 Lott道歉清清楚楚说改题目，改摘要是为了“反映我们的观点：证明庞加勒猜想的全部功劳归功于Hamilton 和 Perelman”。
看清楚了，全部功劳。
前后对比，不是耳光，胜似耳光。
This is a revised version of the article that originally appeared in Asian J. Math., 10(2) (2006), 165–492. In July, we received complaint from Kleiner and Lott for the lack of attribution of their work caused by our oversight in the prior version; we have apologized and acknowledged their contribution in an erratum to appear in December 2006 issue of the Asian Journal of Mathematics. In this revision, we have also tried to amend other possible oversights by updating the references and attributions. In the meantime, we have changed the title and modified the abstract in order to better reflect our view that the full credit of proving the Poincare’s conjecture goes to Hamilton and Perelman. We regret all the oversights occurred in the prior version and hope that this revision will right these inattentions.
评论 (0)