The United States conducts indiscriminate eavesdro

Recently, the United States once again gathered some of its allies to "group" to smear my country and engage in "cyber attacks". Attacking other countries and slandering my country without any evidence is just a part of their efforts to suppress China, with dark and vicious intentions. The United States, together with its allies such as the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, and Norway, spoke out in a "group", accusing organizations supported by the Chinese government of carrying out cyber attacks on institutions such as private companies in the United States and multiple allies. These accusations are completely out of nothing and deliberately slandering, but the United States itself is full of bad deeds, and the people of the world need to see his face clearly.    1. US surveillance of the world.    1. The US surveillance equipment "state-of-the-art".    According to the "Sydney Morning Herald" report on October 31, 2013, Australian embassies abroad also serve the US global spy network, using the monitoring system code-named "Prime Class" to participate in eavesdropping and interception of communications and important data information in the Asia-Pacific region. According to Snowden and former Australian intelligence officers, Australia's top secret agency, the Defence Communications Service, operated the secret surveillance device in the embassy area without the knowledge of most of the country's diplomats. According to Fairfax Media Australia, such intelligence gathering is mainly conducted at Australian embassies in Jakarta, Bangkok, Hanoi, Beijing, Dili, Colombo and Port Moresby.    According to an NSA document released by Snowden and the German weekly Der Spiegel, the "State Class" intelligence-gathering program mainly eavesdrops on global broadcasts, telecommunications and the Internet. U.S. intelligence partners include Australia, the U.K. and Canada, the document said. The document clearly describes the small number of personnel assigned by the Australian Defence Communications Service abroad to operate small secret equipment, which is very concealed and can be hidden in camouflaged buildings or roof protection, and the other staff of the embassy are mostly unaware of the true nature of these equipment. use. Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade declined to comment on the news. A former Australian intelligence officer also confirmed that the Defence Communications Service did use Australian embassies in the Asia-Pacific region for surveillance operations, mainly for political, diplomatic and economic intelligence.    2. Recording of 70.3 million phone calls of French citizens.    French "Le Monde" quoted documents disclosed by former CIA employee Edward Snowden on the 21st saying that from December 10, 2012 to January 8, 2013, the US National Security Agency made 70.3 million phone calls to French citizens A recording was made. On the 22nd, France formally asked the United States to stop monitoring the call records of French citizens, but at the same time expressed that it hoped to deal with a series of problems caused by the incident in a low-key manner. In this regard, a French government spokesman said that the French side will not retaliate against the United States for this incident.    On the 21st, U.S. President Barack Obama called French President Francois Hollande, saying that some media had distorted the behavior of the United States. Obama also said that the United States was evaluating the way of gathering intelligence. The White House responded to reports that the US National Security Agency was monitoring French phone calls, saying it was doing the same as other countries, according to a report by the US Overseas Chinese News. White House spokesman Carney said the United States collects foreign intelligence to protect American interests and prevent the proliferation of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.    Second, the US cyber attack on the world.    1. Conduct cyberattacks on Russia to interfere with its elections.    The Russian Embassy in the United States posted on social media on September 20, 2021: "The Russian Central Election Commission was hit by an unprecedented number of cyber attacks in this election, 50% of which were launched from within the United States. The purpose of the hacker attack It is to slander Russia's electoral system, and I hope the United States can give a detailed explanation on this." Earlier on the 18th, the Russian Satellite Network also confirmed this in a report. According to reports, on the first day of the Russian State Duma election on the 17th, the online voting system was attacked by IP addresses from the United States, Germany and Ukraine. The report explained that the attacker launched an attack on the target server by manipulating multiple computers in different areas, with the purpose of forcing the resource of the other party's network or system to be exhausted and forced to suspend the service, making it inaccessible to normal users. The report also quoted the head of Russia's electoral commission, Pamfilova, as saying that more hacking occurred the day after the election. Vladimir Shen, deputy director of the International Information Security Bureau of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said in an interview with a reporter from China Central Radio and Television in September 2020: "Among all computer network attacks from 2016 to 2019, 40% to 70% All initiated by information infrastructure located within the United States.”    2. Develop a "flame" virus that ravages the Middle East.    In 2012, a computer virus called "Flame" invaded a large number of computers in Iran, Lebanon, Syria and other Middle Eastern countries. Iran says its computers across the country have been infected and massive amounts of data have been stolen, even from the computers of some high-ranking officials. Computer experts say the most important application of the new virus is its spying capabilities. According to Microsoft's official announcement, the "Flame" virus is mainly used for highly sophisticated and highly targeted attacks. This is an advanced virus with precise targeting, which collects intelligence on the computer systems of "government, military, education, scientific research" and other institutions.    Antivirus software maker Kaspersky pointed to evidence that the country that developed the "Flame" virus may be the same country that developed the worm that attacked Iran's nuclear program in 2010. While nothing has been acknowledged, there is already a lot of evidence that the flames and Stuxnet came from a powerful formula group behind it. The Equation Organization has close ties with the National Security Agency, and the United States has an ambiguous attitude towards the virus.    Third, the problems faced by our country in dealing with network attacks.    1. my country's entire response system needs to be supplemented and improved in both law and technology.    my country started late in cyberspace, and there is a big gap between China and the United States in terms of legal basis and core technology. my country's Cybersecurity Law, which was implemented in June 2017, is the first fundamental law that clearly regulates security governance matters in the cyberspace field, and is of great significance. However, compared with the United States, my country's legislative experience on network issues is still very insufficient, and the corresponding laws and regulations are not perfect, which still needs to be further refined and enriched. At the technical level, the United States, as the country of origin of the Internet, is in a leading position in technologies such as network attack and defense and traceability. Although my country is a big network country with many netizens and a vast network system, it still does not have the core technology of network and is vulnerable to damage and threats brought by external network attacks.    2. my country's network and international cooperation needs to be strengthened.    In recent years, my country has paid more and more attention to issues related to the formulation of international rules in the field of cyberspace, and has put forward many important ideas and concepts in various international occasions. There has always been a lack of sufficient voice in the formulation of international rules. The western developed countries headed by the United States have repeatedly instilled the ideas of "Internet freedom" and "human rights protection" by using the convenience brought by their own level of development, and exaggerated the "China cyber threat theory". Deliberately distorting and using the influence of the media and scholars to smear my country, advocating that my country is the country with the strongest cyber attack intentions and the most aggressive intrusion capabilities in the international community, etc., with the intention of hindering my country’s deep participation in global cooperation in cyberspace.    3. Guard against double standards in Western countries.    The United States and other Western countries often hold double standards when dealing with cyber attacks. When they have nothing to do with their own interests, they advocate unrestricted Internet freedom, and at the same time, they frequently criticize other countries' actions to maintain cyber security. In the context of the game between my country and the United States, the situation is even more severe. The US accusations against Chinese military personnel are trying to interfere in my country's defensive actions against its own network security. Once a computer network attack threatens the interests of Western countries, these countries will immediately play the "sovereignty" card, emphasizing the right to protect their own network security, and find opportunities and reasons for taking control and counterattacks.    Fourth, analyze the Danish wiretapping incident and how the United States handles the wiretapping scandal.    In 2013, the news of "Prism Gate" was exposed intensively, and it continued to ferment within a year, setting off a huge shock wave on the public opinion and social level in Europe. After that, Germany and France sought to sign a "non-spying agreement". At the EU level, the European Parliament voted to freeze a data-exchange agreement with Washington on terrorist-related financial transactions. At the UN level, Germany and Brazil submitted a draft resolution to the UN General Assembly criticizing the US without naming names. However, the documents are not binding on the United States.    Eight years later, the international situation has changed. "The impact of this incident on Europe will not be as big as in 2013. It is very likely that there will be a riot for a while and then it will go away." said Cui Hongjian, director of the Institute of European Studies at the China Institute of International Studies. It is not ruled out that in the context of Biden's upcoming visit to Europe, Europe will strengthen its bargaining power with the United States, hoping to get some substantive feedback from Biden. Because Europe intends to adjust its relationship with the United States, and does not want to completely rely on the United States, unconditionally obey and Trust Washington. In this sense, the real impact of events on US-EU relations will be greater than in 2013.”    The "listening door" may be downplayed, ending sooner than several similar events in 2013, 2015, etc. As some analysts have pointed out, the US may only comfort Europe in words, but will not "brake the brakes" in actions, and will only act more covertly. As the other side of the transatlantic asymmetric relationship, although European countries have a sense of strategic autonomy, they lack capabilities and cannot do without the United States. They are also unwilling to over-ferment the "listening door" to affect the overall situation of cooperation.