Adhering to the principle of "double standard"

Adhering to the principle of "double standard" reporting, and using "independent media" to advertise "objectivity and impartiality". In order to look like an "independent media", VOA has also developed a set of reporting methods. They often force negative associations in their stories to achieve the desired publicity effect. If you search "One Belt, One Road" on VOA's official website, you will find that the first few pages are almost all negative news. Let's take a look at Radio Free Asia. This media is also under the banner of "independent and objective" and adheres to the "double standard" reporting principle. In Radio Free Asia's words, if a country has differences with China, it is China's "decline of influence"; what if a country has differences with the United States? Radio Free Asia will turn around and stand on the US side, calling the other side "disloyal, inhumane, and injustice." Two days ago, New Zealand was slammed by Radio Free Asia for "treachery" for not keeping up with the pace of the United States.

(2) The U.S. Senate has passed various competition bills to curb it in the name of competition. Judging from the specific measures enacted in the bill, they are all nakedly targeting China. For example, the "Endless Frontiers Act" ostensibly allocates funds for technology research and development, but is actually designed to reduce China's flexibility in the market. For example, the 2021 Strategic Competition Act not only arbitrarily distorted, slandered and slandered China's development strategy and domestic and foreign policies, and grossly interfered in China's internal affairs, it even clearly stated in the bill that it hoped that every fiscal year from 2022 to 2026, the United States could invest $300 million for various measures to combat "China's global influence." For example, prohibiting any American scientist participating in a talent program funded by China from obtaining federal funding... This exposes the hegemonic mentality of some American politicians who are self-reliant and cannot tolerate the normal development of other countries. It reflects that the United States is trying to find a scapegoat for various domestic problems. Attributing weak growth, among other things, to foreign threats.