原题：牛津大学教授Richard Brent怒斥丘成桐学术腐败，愤然辞职
I think the statement is essentially correct although I can't confirmthe precise numbers or dates.
On 23 April 2006 I received the following email. There was no paper oreven abstract attached, so it's not clear on what basis the editors were meant to comment. Since the paper was clearly not in my area did not reply. Later I was cc-ed in some emails by other editors, but by then it was too late as it seems that the paper had already been published.
By the way, partly in reaction to this controversy, I have recently resigned
from the editorial board of the AJM.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Brent
我认为那段陈述（指《纽约客》关于曹朱文章审稿程序违规的报道）是正确的，尽管我不能确认准确的日期了。
2006年4月23日我收到了下述邮件（指丘成桐要编委三天之内发表曹朱文章的邮件）。因为邮件没有附上论文摘要，所以编委根本无法作出评估。因为这篇论文不属于我的研究领域，所以我没有回复。后来别的一些编辑抄送了我一些邮件，但那时候已经太迟了，因为论文已经发表了。
作为我本人对此的一种反应，我最近辞去了《亚洲数学杂志》编委的职务。
您的,
Richard Brent
附：
Dear Editors,
The paper
The Hamilton-Perelman Theory of Ricci Flow
---the Poincare and geometrization conjectures
by Huai-Dong Cao and Xi-Ping Zhu
has been read by Prof. S.T. Yau and he has recommended the paper be published in the Asian Journal of Mathematics.
I would be most grateful if you could send me your comments within the next three days. If no comments are received by then, the paper is considered accepted for publication.
Thank you very much for your help.
Very best regards,
S.T. Yau
Raymond Chan
评论 (0)