来客网

石溪Michael Anderson向邱成桐解释: Nasar让我恶心

声明:本文转载自 「八阕--科技时空」, 或因排版与篇幅原因进行过编辑,内容未经本站独立核实,不代表本站立场、观点或建议。 如涉及版权问题,请联系我们,核实后立即删除。 [ 免责声明 ]

原题:纽约石溪分校数学系教授Michael Anderson致丘先生信件: Nasar让我恶心!

我刚从欧洲结束10天的旅行回来,过去几天一直没有收email。

对于Nasar文章中所写的文字,我感到极为愤怒,非常震惊。他引用我所说的话完全是错误的,没有根据的。除了你所指出的以外,文章中还有其他不真实的地方。

今天晚上我已经给她留了电话与email,希望明天能够与她交谈,把问题向她说清楚。我希望他把我的这些话完全从文章中删除。这些话毫无意义可言,完全不包含什么实际的信息;我只把它看作是愚蠢的闲谈,根本不值得登上《纽约人》杂志的文章。目前,这期杂志还没有正式印刷,所以还有补救的机会。

我花了许多小时在电话里与S. Nasar讨论Perelman,Poincare等。可是我太天真地(现在感到极度恶心)相信这个记者会真实地报道我所说的话。

我很抱歉这些话居然被放到了我的嘴里,我会尽全力把它删除的。

在我获得更多信息后,会随时通知您。

Michael

Michael

>> Date: August 23, 2006 8:36:17 PM EDT

>> Dear Yau,

>>

>> I just returned earlier today from 10 days in Europe, and

>> was out of email contact for the last several days.

>> I am furious, and completely shocked, at what Sylvia Nasar

>> wrote. Her quote of me is completely wrong and baseless. There are

>> other factual mistakes in the article, in addition to those you

>> pointed out.

>> I have left her phone and email messages this evening and

>> hope to speak to her tomorrow at the latest to clear this up. I want

>> her to remove this statement completely from the article. It serves

>> no purpose and contains no factual information; I view it as stupid

>> gossip unworthy of a paper like the New Yorker. At the moment, the

>> print version has not appeared and so it might be possible to fix

>> this still.

>> I spent several hours with S. Nasar on the phone talking

>> about Perelman, Poincare, etc but it seems I was too naive (and

>> I'm now disgusted) in believing this journalist would report factually.

>> I regret very much this quote falsely attributed to me

>> and will do whatever I can to have it removed.

>> I will keep you informed as I know more.

>>

>> Yours, Michael

评论 (0)