原题：最新消息：真相大白 丘成桐雇佣公关公司在纽约时报自我宣传
翻译英文消息：
根据最新消息，《纽约时报》对丘成桐的宣传，是香港商人陈启宗出钱，雇佣乐专业公关公司。
《纽约客》杂志不仅前报道丘成桐卷入不光彩事件。丘成桐大为丢脸。香港商人陈启宗长期资助丘成桐，投资丘成桐，扩大丘成桐在中国影响。据信，陈启宗不愿意让自己的投资因为丑闻而落空。雇佣了专业公关公司，写好宣传稿，交给纽约时报记者。纽约时报记者没有采访任何中国人，没有到中国，对丘成桐在中国的作为没有任何调查，全部照抄公司宣传稿，写出丘成桐乐意的文章。丘成桐帮立即翻译，连美国人都讲中国古文（丘成桐帮说，美国数学家摩根博士评丘，“公之美德唯夫不殆，公之疏漏亦奉有余”。明明是指责了丘成桐道德有问题，丘成桐坚持用“疏漏亦奉有余”来轻描淡写对丘的批评。
如果丘成桐是诚实的人，他可以澄清是否雇佣了公关公司，哪里来的钱雇公关公司，公关公司宣传材料怎么写的。
According to the latest news released online by a knowledgable person (-hra-), the New York Times article on Shing-Tung Yau was provided by a PR company which was paid for by Ronny Chan, a Hong Kong businessman.
ST Yau was involved in a scandal reported by the New Yorker. The report infuriated Yau. Yau has long been supported by the Hong Kong businessman Ronny Chan. It is believed that Chan did not like to see his investment in expanding Yau's influence in China diminished by the scandal. A PR company was hired and wrote propaganda which was fed to the New York Times science writer. The writer did not interview a single Chinese to investigate the truth behind Yau's behavior in China and took the exact words from Yau's propaganda financed by a businessman.
If Yau is an honest man, he should be able to confirm or deny about the truth of the PR company: its existence, its source of financial support and the propaganda supplied by the PR company.
评论 (0)