每逢国庆日，我们高举马来西亚国旗，唱起国歌，并自豪地谈论团结。但在庆祝活动背后，却隐藏著一个我们很少愿意坦诚面对的问题：
谁才是更“马来西亚人”的马来西亚人？是那些家族在这里生活了好几代的人吗？是能够流利说马来西亚国语的人吗？是把国旗穿在身上的人吗？是支持政府的人，还是敢于批评政府的人？马来人是否因为这里是“Tanah Melayu”（马来土地），所以就更加“马来西亚”？华裔或印裔马来西亚人是否必须一次又一次地证明自己的忠诚？来自沙巴或砂拉越的人，是否在我们的国家历史叙事中，反而离“中心”更远？一个人的国语不够流利、饮食习惯不同，或者以另一种语言进行祈祷，是否就意味著他“不够马来西亚”？
我们以各种方式提出这些问题，即使从来没有把它们说出口。
有时候，当一个人被叫嚣“滚回你的国家”，但那个国家其实从来不是他的家时，这种情况就发生了。有时候，一个人的宗教信仰，会因为他所加入的政党而受到质疑；有时候，当马来西亚人站出来反对不公不义，却被指责是在“让国家蒙羞”，仿佛爱国就意味著保持沉默；有时候，我们甚至认定那些与自己意见不同的人，一定没有我们那么爱马来西亚。但马来西亚从来不只属于那些拥有特定外貌、说特定语言、信奉特定宗教或支持特定政治立场的人。
马来西亚属于那个在学校集会上背诵《国家原则》的孩子，属于那个天还没亮就起床、为陌生人准备早餐的小贩，属于那个彻夜工作的护士、那个自掏腰包为学生购买用品的老师，以及那个在大多数人还没醒来之前，就已经开始清扫街道的清洁工。它也属于那位每年8月，依然坚持在住家门外挂上一面已经褪色的马来西亚国旗的老人，也属于那个正在思考“这里是否还有我的未来”的年轻马来西亚人。他们都不应该被要求证明自己属于这个国家。
我是马来人、穆斯林、女性，也是民主行动党党员。我曾经因为这些身份而受到质疑，仿佛这些身份彼此无法共存。有些人认为，加入一个多元种族政党，就意味著我“不够马来人”；也有人认为，一个敢于公开谈论不公不义的人，就“不够爱国”。但我从来不认为，爱马来西亚就意味著必须放弃自己身份中的任何一部分。我的马来人身份，并不会阻止我站在一个寻求帮助的华裔家庭身边；我的信仰，也不会阻止我捍卫一个信奉不同宗教者的权益；我的政治立场，更不会因为邻居投票给不同的政党，就把他视为敌人。这就是我心中的马来西亚。
马来西亚从来就不是单一的肤色、单一的语言或单一的故事。我们是不同历史在同一片土地上交汇后形成的国家。我们的力量，从来不是来自假装彼此之间不存在差异，而是来自即使存在差异，我们依然选择共同生活。然而，独立数十年后，我们依然允许有人利用身份政治作为武器。我们依然被告知，一个族群正受到另一个族群的威胁；我们依然被鼓励去害怕自己的邻居，而不是去质问那些从分裂社会中获益的人。挥舞国旗很容易，真正实践国旗所代表的价值，却更加困难。
爱国并不是谁喊得最大声，也不是不断宣称自己有多爱这个国家。爱国，体现在我们如何对待那些与我们共同生活在这片土地上的人。我们是否尊重一个母语与我们不同的马来西亚人？我们是否会像捍卫自己族群的权益一样坚定地捍卫其他族群的权益？当有人批评这个国家时，我们能否接受，而不是立即指责对方背叛国家？当政治立场不同的时候，我们能否保持分歧，而不是质疑彼此的忠诚？一个成熟的国家，不应该要求人民盲目服从，而应该培养出愿意关心国家、甚至敢于提出艰难问题的公民。
希望马来西亚变得更好，并不是不忠。恰恰因为我们热爱这个国家，所以我们拒绝接受贪污、种族主义、歧视和不公不义，成为马来西亚生活中永远无法改变的一部分。独立，从来不应该只是把国家治理权从殖民政府交到本地领导人手中，它更是一项承诺——我们将共同决定自己的未来。
然而，当一些马来西亚人被迫觉得自己永远只是这个国家的“客人”时，独立就仍然是不完整的；当一个人的种族决定了别人是否相信他的忠诚时，独立仍然是不完整的；当宗教被利用来制造分裂，而不是引导我们走向慈悲与包容时，独立仍然是不完整的；当年轻马来西亚人认为，自己必须离开这个国家，才能获得公平的肯定与价值时，独立仍然是不完整的。
真正的马来西亚
当年争取独立的那一代人，问的是：马来亚能否实现自治？而我们这一代面对的，是另一个问题：马来西亚是否终于能够平等地信任所有马来西亚人？或许，成为马来西亚人，并不是看谁的祖先最早来到这里。
或许，真正重要的是——谁选择留下来、服务这个国家、关心这个社会，并参与建设它。是那个发生车祸后停下来帮忙，却不会先问伤者是什么种族的人；是那个把食物送给正在庆祝不同节日的邻居的家庭；是那个在邻居家发生火灾时，愿意伸出援手的社区；也是那个称呼你为“兄弟”“姐妹”“阿姨”或“叔叔”的陌生人，而且是真心这样称呼你的人。这些平凡的时刻，比任何政治口号都更能告诉我们，什么才是真正的马来西亚。
今年国庆，让我们停止追问谁才是“更马来西亚”的人。没有所谓“更马来西亚”或“较不马来西亚”。公民身份不是一场比赛，而归属感也不是某一个族群可以赐予或剥夺的奖品。真正重要的问题，不是另一个人是否配得上被称为马来西亚人，而是：我们是否已经建立了一个马来西亚，让每一名公民都能够毫不犹豫、毫无恐惧地说：“这也是我的国家。”
而如果在独立将近70年之后，仍然有一些马来西亚人觉得自己必须请求别人允许他们属于这个国家——那么，也许今年国庆，我们真正应该问的，并不是“我们有多自由？”而是：“我们距离真正的自由，还有多远？”
瑟丽娜《我们还要经过多少代，才算是真正的马来西亚人？》原文：How Many Generations Before We Are Malaysian Enough?
Every Merdeka, we raise the Jalur Gemilang, sing the national anthem and speak proudly about unity. But beneath the celebrations lies a question we rarely confront honestly:
Who is more Malaysian?
Is it the person whose family has lived here for generations? The person who speaks Bahasa Malaysia fluently? The person who wears the flag on their shirt? The person who supports the government—or the one who criticises it?
Is a Malay more Malaysian because this is Tanah Melayu? Is a Chinese or Indian Malaysian expected to prove their loyalty repeatedly? Is someone from Sabah or Sarawak somehow further from the centre of our national story? Is a person less Malaysian because their Bahasa Malaysia is imperfect, their food is different, or their prayers are spoken in another language?
We ask these questions in many ways, even when we do not say them aloud.
Sometimes it happens when someone is told to “go back” to a country they have never called home.
Sometimes it happens when a person’s faith is questioned because of the political party they joined.
Sometimes it happens when Malaysians who speak up against injustice are accused of embarrassing the country—as though patriotism means silence.
And sometimes it happens when we decide that those who disagree with us must love Malaysia less than we do.
But Malaysia does not belong only to those who look, speak, pray or vote in a particular way.
Malaysia belongs to the child reciting the Rukun Negara at school assembly. It belongs to the hawker waking before sunrise to prepare breakfast for strangers. It belongs to the nurse working through the night, the teacher spending her own money on her students, and the cleaner sweeping our streets before most of us are awake.
It belongs to the elderly uncle who still hangs a faded Jalur Gemilang outside his home every August. It belongs to the young Malaysian wondering whether there is still a future here for them.
None of them should have to prove that they belong.
I am a Malay, a Muslim, a woman and a member of the DAP. I have been questioned about these parts of my identity as though they cannot exist together. Some assume that joining a multiracial party makes me less Malay. Others believe that speaking openly about injustice makes someone less patriotic.
But I have never believed that loving Malaysia requires me to surrender any part of who I am.
My Malay identity does not prevent me from standing beside a Chinese family seeking help. My faith does not stop me from defending the rights of someone who prays differently. My political beliefs do not make my neighbour an enemy simply because we vote differently.
That, to me, is Malaysia.
Malaysia has never been one colour, one language or one story. We are the result of different histories meeting on the same soil. Our strength has never come from pretending those differences do not exist. It comes from choosing to live together despite them.
Yet after decades of independence, we still allow people to weaponise identity. We are still told that one community is under threat from another. We are still encouraged to fear our neighbours instead of questioning those who benefit from keeping us divided.
It is easy to wave a flag. It is harder to live by what the flag represents.
Patriotism is not about shouting the loudest or constantly declaring that we love the country. It is found in how we treat the people with whom we share it.
Do we respect a Malaysian whose mother tongue is different from ours?
Do we defend another community’s rights as firmly as we defend our own?
Can we accept criticism of the country without accusing the critic of betrayal?
Can we disagree politically without questioning one another’s loyalty?
A mature nation does not demand blind obedience. It creates citizens who care enough to ask difficult questions. Wanting Malaysia to improve is not an act of disloyalty. It is precisely because we love this country that we refuse to accept corruption, racism, discrimination or injustice as permanent features of Malaysian life.
Merdeka was never meant to be merely the transfer of power from a colonial government to local leaders. It was the promise that we would determine our future together.
But independence remains incomplete when some Malaysians are made to feel like permanent guests in their own country.
It remains incomplete when a person’s race determines whether their loyalty is trusted. It remains incomplete when religion is used to divide rather than guide us towards compassion. It remains incomplete when young Malaysians believe they must leave the country to be valued fairly.
The generation that fought for Merdeka asked whether Malaya could govern itself.
Our generation faces a different question: can Malaysia finally learn to trust all Malaysians equally?
Perhaps being Malaysian is not about whose ancestors arrived first. Perhaps it is about who chooses to stay, to serve, to care and to build.
It is the person who stops to help after an accident without first asking the victim’s race. It is the family that sends food to a neighbour celebrating a different festival. It is the community that comes together when a home burns down. It is the stranger who calls you “brother,” “sister,” “aunty” or “uncle” and means it.
These ordinary moments tell us more about Malaysia than any political slogan ever could.
This Merdeka, let us stop asking who is more Malaysian.
There is no “more Malaysian” or “less Malaysian.”
Citizenship is not a competition, and belonging is not a prize one community can withhold from another.
The more important question is not whether someone else deserves to be called Malaysian.
The question is whether we have built a Malaysia in which every citizen can say, without hesitation or fear:
“This is my country too.”
And if, after nearly seven decades of independence, some Malaysians still feel they must ask for permission to belong—then perhaps the question we should be asking this Merdeka is not how free we are, but how much further we still have to go.
本文观点，不代表《东方日报》立场。
要看最快最熱資訊，請來Follow我們 《東方日報》WhatsApp Channel.
追踪东方日报社交平台
Telegram Xiaohongshu logo - Brandlogos.net追看热门新闻资讯，请下载东方日报APP
Google Play：https://odn.my/android
HUAWEI AppGallery：https://odn.my/appgallery
评论 (0)